Architecture Assessment
Compare prompting, RAG, tool use, fine-tuning, and hybrid approaches against the requirement.
SERVICE / LLM ENGINEERING
We help teams determine when prompting, retrieval, tool use, or model adaptation is the right technical approach—and when those methods should be combined.
Fine-tuning is useful when a task requires consistent behavior, specialized structure, domain language, or learned patterns that cannot be supplied efficiently at inference time.
01 / SYSTEM VIEW
02 / WHAT WE BUILD
Compare prompting, RAG, tool use, fine-tuning, and hybrid approaches against the requirement.
Collect, clean, label, balance, version, and govern training and evaluation examples.
Adapt capable base models to specialized output patterns and domain tasks.
Define task-specific metrics, rubrics, holdout sets, and human review processes.
Package inference, scaling, versioning, monitoring, rollback, and cost controls.
Use production evidence to improve datasets, prompts, routing, and model behavior.
03 / CORE CAPABILITIES
04 / REPRESENTATIVE USE CASES
05 / DELIVERY APPROACH
Measure a strong prompt, retrieval, and tool-enabled solution before training.
Specify desired behavior, boundaries, data requirements, metrics, and deployment constraints.
Prepare representative, licensed, balanced, and reviewable training and evaluation data.
Run controlled experiments against the baseline and analyze failure categories.
Version models, monitor drift, manage rollback, and retain evaluation coverage.
06 / QUALITY + CONTROL
We use holdout data, task rubrics, failure analysis, cost, latency, and maintainability to decide whether adaptation earns its complexity.
LET'S DEFINE THE RIGHT SYSTEM
Start with the task, available data, current baseline, and operating constraints.